In a case that underscores the dangers of digital evidence, a Utah real estate agent’s online activity and smartphone data played a decisive role in her conviction for murder. Kouri Richins was sentenced to life in prison without parole on August 14, 2024, for the fentanyl overdose death of her husband, Eric Richins, in March 2022.

The investigation began after Eric’s death, when Utah police seized Kouri’s iPhone. Forensic analysis revealed that numerous text messages had been deleted from the device around the time of Eric’s death. Additionally, cell phone tower pings provided a timeline of Kouri’s movements in the days leading up to the incident, both of which became pivotal evidence in the prosecution’s case.

Prosecutors argued that Kouri had administered fentanyl to Eric without his knowledge, then attempted to collect on multiple life insurance policies she had opened in his name—policies he was unaware of. The state’s case relied heavily on digital records, including searches and communications that suggested premeditation.

One of the most striking examples of incriminating online activity was a search query Kouri made shortly after Eric’s death. She asked a search engine, “What kind of doctor was dr. pepper”—a question that, while seemingly innocuous, reflected her awareness of fentanyl’s medical context. (There is no actual “Dr. Pepper” associated with the drug.)

The jury found Kouri guilty of murder, concluding that her actions were deliberate and motivated by financial gain. The case serves as a stark reminder of how digital footprints—even seemingly unrelated searches—can be used as evidence in criminal investigations.