New York lawmakers are advancing a bill that would mandate companies with a net income of $5 million or more to reduce or eliminate plastic packaging.

Proponents argue the legislation would combat pollution, minimize waste, and shift more recycling costs from taxpayers to corporations. “This bill ensures that large businesses contribute fairly to environmental protection while reducing plastic waste,” said a spokesperson for the bill’s sponsors.

However, opponents—including grocery stores, packaging manufacturers, and business associations—warn of unintended consequences. They claim the bill could:

  • Increase prices for everyday items like toilet paper, diapers, and paper towels due to higher costs of alternative packaging.
  • Reduce product protection, leading to damaged goods and supply chain disruptions.
  • Impose financial burdens on families already facing rising living costs.

Critics also question whether the proposed alternatives to plastic are as effective or affordable. “This bill could backfire by making essential products less accessible and more expensive,” stated a representative from a major retail trade group.

Supporters counter that the environmental benefits justify the potential drawbacks. “The long-term cost of plastic pollution far exceeds short-term price increases,” argued an environmental advocacy group.

The bill remains under debate in the New York State Legislature, with no scheduled vote date as of now.

The post Brickbat: Not Fantastic appeared first on Reason.com.

Source: Reason