ArXiv, the widely used preprint repository for academic research, is implementing stricter measures to curb the submission of papers containing AI slop—content generated by large language models (LLMs) without proper human oversight.

According to Thomas Dietterich, ArXiv’s section chair for its computer science section, researchers found to have submitted papers with "incontrovertible evidence that the authors did not check the results of LLM generation" will face a one-year ban from the platform. Such evidence includes hallucinated references or meta-comments left by an LLM.

Dietterich also announced that future submissions must now be accepted at "a reputable peer-reviewed venue" before being uploaded to ArXiv.

ArXiv’s Official Statement on AI Slop

Attention @arxiv authors: Our Code of Conduct states that by signing your name …

Dietterich shared this statement on X (formerly Twitter), emphasizing ArXiv’s commitment to maintaining research integrity in the face of rising AI-generated content.

Source: The Verge