The 2026 FIFA World Cup is set to kick off in just one month, and 11 NFL stadiums will host matches. While these venues typically use artificial turf for football, FIFA has mandated the installation of high-quality natural grass for soccer, the NFL Players Association (NFLPA) noted in a statement.
In a post on X (formerly Twitter) on Monday, the NFLPA emphasized that NFL players have long advocated for safer, high-quality grass fields at their workplaces. However, the association pointed out a stark inconsistency: once the World Cup concludes, most stadiums will revert to artificial turf for the NFL season.
"Our players deserve workplaces that prioritize their preference, protect them against the weekly wear and tear of the game, and support their long-term health and performance," the NFLPA stated.
Grass vs. Turf: Player Preference and Health Concerns
The league has argued that injury rates on grass and turf are comparable, but the NFLPA countered that players overwhelmingly prefer grass, regardless of injury statistics. The association highlighted a key difference in player experience:
"Grass fields absorb the forces created by the human body. Turf fields send the forces back into the player's joints and bones. Anyone who has ever done anything on artificial turf knows the difference the next morning, the moment they try to climb out of bed."
This preference is evident in the NFLPA's push for grass fields, despite the league's claims about injury parity.
Owners' Choices: Cost vs. Player Safety
The NFLPA acknowledged that stadium owners installed grass fields for the World Cup because FIFA required it. Outside of FIFA's mandate, however, many owners continue to opt for artificial turf—a surface that is cheaper to maintain and easier to adapt for revenue-generating events.
This dynamic has turned the grass vs. turf debate into a collective bargaining issue. The NFLPA suggested that owners may resist switching to grass unless players concede on other fronts, as maintaining turf fields aligns with financial incentives.
Not all teams are resistant to change. The Buffalo Bills' new stadium, for example, will feature a grass field, demonstrating a willingness to prioritize player safety over cost savings.
Will Change Happen Without Mandate?
The NFLPA expressed skepticism that owners will voluntarily adopt grass fields without external pressure. The association implied that meaningful change may require significant concessions from players to incentivize owners to invest in safer playing surfaces.
"The willingness to put the good of the players over the bottom line is hardly universal," the NFLPA stated. "And it won't change until the owners have no choice."