Michael, the new biopic about the late pop legend Michael Jackson, has been widely condemned as a cynical, shallow cash grab rather than a meaningful tribute to his life and legacy.

The film, directed by Antoine Fuqua, attempts to recount Jackson’s rise from child star to global icon, but critics argue it reduces the complex artist to a sanitized caricature designed to exploit his fame for profit. The movie is structured as a series of familiar moments and montages, offering little in the way of genuine storytelling or historical insight.

What the Movie Gets Wrong

The film’s approach is widely seen as cynical, treating Jackson less like a real person and more like a Marvel character—complete with Easter eggs for fans to uncover. Subtle references to his cosmetic surgeries, painkiller addiction, and Peter Pan fixation are sprinkled throughout, but the movie avoids any serious examination of his life, controversies, or legacy.

Key Criticisms of the Film

  • Lack of Depth: The film reduces Jackson to a series of vague, idealized traits—sensitive, disconnected, and obsessed with childhood—without addressing his complexities or the controversies that defined his later years.
  • Sanitized Portrayal: Despite being produced in collaboration with Jackson’s estate, the movie avoids any meaningful discussion of his child sexual abuse allegations or other controversies, instead presenting a version of Jackson stripped of his humanity.
  • Cynical Storytelling: The film’s structure is designed to recreate familiar moments rather than tell a coherent story, leaving audiences with a karaoke-like experience rather than a compelling narrative.

Cast and Crew

The film stars Jaafar Jackson, Jackson’s nephew, as the adult Michael, and Juliano Valdi as the young Jackson. Antoine Fuqua, known for directing The Equalizer and Training Day, is at the helm, but critics argue his direction does little to elevate the material.

"It is a movie designed to give you a karaoke experience in a theater setting with other like-minded Michael Jackson fans. It is a movie designed to make the estate of a dead pop star a great deal of money, in line with other milquetoast biopics about other stars, like Bohemian Rhapsody or Springsteen: Deliver Me From Nowhere."

Why This Biopic Fails

Critics argue that even a sanitized biopic about one of the greatest and most fascinating artists of all time could have offered more depth and insight. Instead, Michael treats Jackson as a one-dimensional idea, carefully crafted to undermine the negative perceptions surrounding him without addressing them directly.

The film’s approach is seen as particularly cynical, especially given its collaboration with Jackson’s estate, which has historically been protective of his legacy. While the movie may appeal to die-hard fans looking for a nostalgic experience, it offers little for those seeking a thoughtful or nuanced portrayal of the artist.

Source: Defector