The Supreme Court is currently examining a case that may fundamentally alter privacy rights for every American who uses a smartphone. On Monday, the Court heard arguments in Chatrie v. United States, a landmark case involving the use of controversial "geofence warrants" by law enforcement.

The warrants were used to track down Okello Chatrie, the suspect in a 2019 bank robbery near Richmond, Virginia. The case hinges on whether police overstepped constitutional boundaries by accessing Chatrie’s location data through Google Maps’ Location History feature.

This feature can pinpoint a user’s location within three meters and updates every two minutes. Police obtained a geofence warrant to retrieve this data, which led to Chatrie’s arrest. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for how law enforcement accesses digital data from tech companies.

The Supreme Court’s decision will determine the future of privacy rights in the digital age, particularly regarding the limits of geofence warrants and the protection of location data stored by large technology firms.

Source: The Verge