President Donald Trump’s attempt to ban immigrants from claiming asylum at the southern border was blocked in a federal court on Friday, June 20, 2025.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled 2–1 that Trump could not deport immigrants “under summary removal procedures of his own making” or suspend their rights to apply for asylum, even if they cross the border illegally.
The three-judge panel included Cornelia Pillard, an Obama appointee, and J. Michelle Childs, appointed by President Joe Biden, who ruled against Trump. Trump appointee Justin Walker dissented in favor of the administration. The panel upheld a ruling from U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss in July 2024, who stated that Trump’s January 2025 executive order ending asylum claims for those who cross the U.S.-Mexico border violated federal law.
“Barring foreign individuals who are physically present in the United States from applying for asylum and, if they make the statutory showing that they are eligible, from being considered to receive it cannot be squared with the statute,” Childs wrote in her ruling.
Last year, Trump adviser Stephen Miller criticized the lower court’s similar conclusion, calling Judge Moss a “marxist judge” attempting to “circumvent the Supreme Court.” The case is expected to proceed to the Supreme Court next.
Asylum claims have declined under Trump’s administration, which has also fired immigration judges and pursued mass deportations despite repeated court defeats.