The Washington Hilton’s basement ballroom will host the annual White House Correspondents’ Association (WHCA) dinner this Saturday, where members of the D.C. press corps gather in black-tie attire to honor press freedom and the First Amendment.

But this year’s event carries unprecedented stakes: Donald Trump will attend as a guest of honor, raising concerns that his presence could turn the celebration into a platform for press intimidation.

Trump’s history of attacking the media—including calling reporters “enemies of the people,” accusing the New York Times of “treason,” and revoking $1.1 billion in federal funding for public broadcasting—has fueled skepticism about his intentions. His administration has also banned the Associated Press from the White House press pool, filed defamation lawsuits against media outlets, and supported the arrest of journalists.

“Presidents usually say, ‘I don’t like what you do, but I respect the role of the press in democracy,’” said Frank Sesno, former CNN correspondent and Washington bureau chief. “That’s not what Donald Trump has said. We’re living in a world where, if they don’t like something, they sue the reporter or the news organization.”

Sesno’s remarks underscore the broader unease among journalists about Trump’s attendance. While past presidents have used the dinner to signal respect for a free press, Trump’s rhetoric and actions suggest a fundamentally different approach to media relations.

Will the WHCA Dinner Normalize Press Intimidation?

The WHCA dinner has long been criticized as an ostentatious display of Washington excess, but this year’s event takes on added significance. It may serve as a litmus test for how the press corps responds to an administration that openly disdains critical journalism.

“This year will vividly illustrate the role the White House press corps believes it should play when faced with an administration contemptuous of a free press,” the article notes. “And I fear it could go poorly.”

Historical Context: Presidents and the Press

Presidents have attended the WHCA dinner since Calvin Coolidge’s administration, using the event to reinforce the idea that democracy depends on a robust, adversarial press. Trump’s presence, however, threatens to invert that tradition, replacing mutual respect with confrontation.

The stakes extend beyond symbolism. If Trump uses the platform to further delegitimize critical reporting, it could embolden other leaders to escalate attacks on the media worldwide.