Den amerikanske Højesteret anvender i stigende grad sin interimære sagsbehandling, ofte omtalt som 'skygge-dokumentet', til at træffe afgørelser uden omfattende rettergang. Dette emne stod for nylig i centrum for en episode af podcasten We the People, produceret af National Constitution Center.
I episoden deltog professor Steven Vladeck fra Georgetown Law Center sammen med moderator Julie Silverbrook. De diskuterede, hvordan Højesterets stigende brug af den interimære sagsbehandling påvirker retsprocessens gennemsigtighed og retssikkerheden i USA.
Podcasten er nu tilgængelig for lytning på Reason.com og alle større podcastplatforme.
Relaterede artikler
USA's højesteret nægter at stoppe omtegning af valgkredse i Virginia
Today's order is here; the application that was denied is here. The state's argument for a stay, which the Court rejected, begins thus: Days before Vi...
Kvinde sagsøger fængsel for at nægte hjælp under for tidlig fødsel
A woman is suing Houston County in southeast Alabama for violating her constitutional rights after she was forced to give birth preterm with no medica...
Trump og IRS: Kan han tømme statskassen for eget formål?
If the IRS goes ahead and gives in to Donald Trump's demands for a MAGA slush fund, it would be outright theft of the public's money and corruption on...
Postordre-abort midlertidigt reddet af højesteret
Mail-order abortion is preserved, for now: "We are pleased that a safe and effective drug Americans depend on will continue to be available while this...
Højesteret bevarer adgang til medicinsk abort via telemedicin – midlertidigt
Yesterday evening, as expected, the Supreme Court granted mifepristone manufacturers' requests for a stay of an order of the U.S. Court of Appeals for...
USA’s Højesteret afgjorde sagen U.S. v. Morrison for 24 år siden
5/15/2000: U.S. v. Morrison is decided. The post Today in Supreme Court History: May 15, 2000 appeared first on Reason.com.
Hvorfor bruger dommer Alito fodnoter med symboler i sin dissent?
Enough about the merits of Danco. Let's talk about the formatting. Usually when an opinion has one footnote, it is not numbered. Rather, there is simp...
Hvad forbinder Bruen, Dobbs og SFFA? Tre store sager og deres uventede konsekvenser
Randy Barnett and I are nearing completion of the Fifth Edition of our Constitutional Law casebook. We are still waiting for the last batch of cases f...