Anthropic AI training copyright law

Federal Judge Puts Brake on Anthropic’s $1.5B Copyright Settlement

Anthropic’s proposed $1.5 billion settlement over allegations of large-scale book piracy to train its AI models has hit a roadblock. On Thursday, U.S. District Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin declined to grant final approval, citing unresolved objections from authors and class members.

The settlement, which would be the largest copyright settlement in U.S. history, has drawn criticism over its terms. Objectors argue that legal fees for the authors’ representatives are disproportionately high, while payments to class members are insufficient. Judge Martinez-Olguin has asked the authors’ legal team to address these concerns in greater detail.

Key Objections to the Settlement

  • Excessive Legal Fees: Objectors claim the lawyers’ compensation is "way too high" compared to the benefits provided to class members.
  • Inadequate Payments: Some authors describe the proposed payments as a "pittance," arguing they do not reflect the scale of harm caused by Anthropic’s alleged piracy.
  • Exclusion Concerns: Letters reviewed by Ars suggest the authors’ legal team may be attempting to limit the voices of objectors in the process.

Next Steps for the Settlement

Judge Martinez-Olguin has requested further clarification from the authors’ legal representatives to address the objections. The delay underscores the complexity of resolving large-scale copyright disputes in the era of AI training practices. No new approval date has been set.

Source: Ars Technica
Tesla Robotaxis Involved in Two Crashes Since July 2025, Remote Operators at Helm
← Previous

Tesla Robotaxis Involved in Two Crashes Since July 2025, Remote Operat...

 Film Review: 'In the Grey' Falls Flat Despite Star Power of Gyllenhaal and Cavill
Next →

Film Review: 'In the Grey' Falls Flat Despite Star Power of Gyllenhaal...