On April 24, 1963, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Sherbert v. Verner, a pivotal case that examined the intersection of religious freedom and state unemployment benefits.
The case centered on Adele Sherbert, a Seventh-day Adventist who was denied unemployment compensation in South Carolina after refusing to work on Saturdays, her Sabbath day, due to her religious beliefs. The South Carolina Employment Security Commission ruled that her refusal to accept available work violated state law, disqualifying her from benefits.
Sherbert appealed the decision, arguing that the state’s policy violated her First Amendment right to the free exercise of religion. The Supreme Court’s eventual ruling in her favor set a landmark precedent, establishing a strict scrutiny standard for evaluating government actions that burden religious practices.
The Court’s decision in Sherbert v. Verner (1963) remains a cornerstone in constitutional law, influencing later cases involving religious exemptions and government regulations.
Related articles
Justice Alito’s Dissent Footnotes: Why the Unusual Formatting?
Enough about the merits of Danco. Let's talk about the formatting. Usually when an opinion has one footnote, it is not numbered. Rather, there is simp...
How Recent Supreme Court Rulings Reshape Constitutional Law Education and Practice
Randy Barnett and I are nearing completion of the Fifth Edition of our Constitutional Law casebook. We are still waiting for the last batch of cases f...
Supreme Court Blocks Restrictions on Abortion Pill Access via Mail and Telehealth
In a fast-moving case that threatened to decimate access to abortion pills nationwide, the Supreme Court has hit pause on a federal appeals court’s at...
New Study Challenges Supreme Court's Fourth Amendment Curtilage Rulings: Public Perceptions vs. Legal Doctrine
I'm very happy to post a draft of a new article, "Popular Conceptions of Fourth Amendment Curtilage," written together with my co-author Matthew Kugle...
The Roberts Court’s Antipreemption Shift: How the Supreme Court is Rejecting Corporate-Friendly Preemption Claims
The Roberts Court is often derided as a pro-corporation Court. I've lost count of how many stories measure the Chamber of Commerce's success rate befo...
North Dakota Court Rejects Foreign Islamic Divorce Recognition in Landmark Case
From a decision last year in Ali v. Osman, from Judge Stephanie Hayden (N.D. Cass County Dist. Ct.); I just learned about it because it's on appeal to...
Democrats Urged to Adopt Proportional Representation to Fix U.S. Democracy by 2029
You can watch this episode of Right Now With Perry Bacon above or by following this show on YouTube or Substack.The unfairness created by Republican g...
Why Some Advocates Want Congress to Limit Supreme Court Power with a Supermajority Rule
In 1893, a Harvard law professor named James Bradley Thayer published one of the most influential articles in U.S. legal history. "The Origin and Scop...