Elon Musk and Sam Altman faced starkly different experiences during testimony in a high-stakes trial that will shape the future of OpenAI, including governance, funding sources, and profit distribution from its most advanced technologies.
Musk, who initiated the lawsuit, alleges that OpenAI under current leadership has strayed from its original nonprofit mission—to develop AI for humanity’s benefit—and instead prioritizes enriching executives like Altman. His three days on the witness stand were marked by intense questioning from OpenAI’s lawyer, William Savitt, who challenged Musk’s claims that OpenAI executives colluded with Microsoft to "steal a charity" after persuading Musk to donate $38 million in early funding. At times, Musk’s frustration boiled over during the proceedings.
In contrast, Altman’s testimony on Tuesday unfolded with far less adversarial scrutiny. Initially appearing nervous, Altman quickly composed himself and completed his testimony in about four hours. He calmly presented evidence aimed at refuting Musk’s accusations that OpenAI’s shift to a for-profit model was deceptive. Since the lawsuit was filed, Altman has consistently argued that Musk’s legal action stems from personal resentment, including Musk’s failed bid to become OpenAI’s CEO and his company xAI trailing behind OpenAI in AI development.