(Photo illustration by The Bulwark / Photos: Shutterstock)

When Tennessee State Rep. Justin Jones took the House floor in Nashville last week to oppose Republican redistricting plans, he drew a stark historical comparison. “You will be in the history books with Bull Connor and George Wallace,” Jones told his GOP colleagues. “And your children will be ashamed of where you stand by presenting these maps.”

Outside the State Capitol, Jones amplified his message with a sign reading “Fight Against White Supremacy!!” Days later, he burned a paper image of the Confederate flag in the building’s halls while chanting, “We will not go back.”

Jones’s defiance resonated with supporters, but it did not alter the outcome. Republicans advanced plans to dismantle Memphis’s majority-black congressional district, a move that will likely leave Black Tennesseans without congressional representation for the first time in decades.

Tennessee is one of several Southern states aggressively redrawing electoral maps following the Supreme Court’s April 29 ruling that gutted Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. The decision has triggered shock, anger, and growing despair among Democrats, who now confront a harsh truth: moral appeals alone won’t reclaim power in the South.

Southern Democrats Confront a New Political Landscape

“It probably fundamentally forces a recalibration of what the Democratic coalition, Democratic electorate looks like in these states,” said Zac McCrary, an Alabama-based Democratic pollster. “It really requires Democrats to think about things and go back to the drawing board in a way that we haven’t had to do in quite some time.”

To understand what that “drawing board” might look like, I spoke with Democratic operatives and officials in six Southern states reshaped by Republican redistricting—Tennessee, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, and Louisiana. The core question: How can Democrats compete for House seats when districts are engineered to favor Republicans?

Rethinking the Democratic Playbook

While final congressional maps remain uncertain in some states, Democrats agree on one point: the party must drastically change its approach. The shift begins with candidate recruitment.

Operatives emphasized the need to nominate candidates whose views on issues like guns, immigration, and social policies extend beyond the national Democratic mainstream. They called for abandoning ideological purity tests and elevating candidates who aren’t hyperpartisan—even if it means diverging from national party orthodoxy. This transformation, they stressed, requires buy-in from the national Democratic Party.

“We have to build a broader coalition in