The U.S. Court of International Trade has ruled that President Donald Trump’s 10% global tariff on most imports is illegal, effectively mirroring the Supreme Court’s earlier decision to strike down a separate set of emergency tariffs. The ruling eliminates the last remaining emergency trade tool Trump could use to replace the invalidated tariffs, leaving his administration with minimal leverage ahead of a high-stakes meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping.

On June 28, 2024, the Supreme Court struck down a prior set of Trump’s emergency tariffs, prompting the president to impose a new 10% tariff on most imports the following day. This new tariff relied on a previously unused provision of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, a decades-old trade law that had never been invoked in this manner.

However, the U.S. Court of International Trade has now invalidated this second tariff, ruling it unlawful. The decision leaves Trump without any remaining emergency trade measures to replace the tariffs, severely limiting his negotiating power as he prepares to meet with Xi Jinping in the coming weeks.

Trump’s trade strategy has long relied on imposing tariffs to incentivize domestic manufacturing and reduce reliance on foreign imports. The invalidation of these tariffs threatens to undermine this core policy, potentially weakening the U.S. position in trade negotiations with China and other partners.

With the tariffs struck down and no immediate replacement available, Trump’s administration faces a critical challenge in maintaining leverage ahead of the anticipated summit with Xi Jinping. Analysts suggest that the ruling could shift the balance of power in favor of China, which has already demonstrated resilience in trade disputes.