In Washington, tensions persist between the White House and one of its most polarizing yet popular figures: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. While polling suggests he boosts Republican support when discussing food policy or labeling ultraprocessed foods, his stance on childhood vaccinations remains contentious.

When Kennedy embarked on a campaign swing through Ohio, a state known for its populist leanings, the visit became a study in contradiction. How could a politician whose reputation stems from questioning routine childhood immunizations avoid the subject entirely? The answer: by reading a children’s book about a trash truck to preschoolers.

The tour spanned northern Ohio, from a regenerative farm in Huron—where two brothers cultivate colorful vegetables—to the Cleveland Clinic, where Kennedy wore a mask entering an operating room during a heart surgery. Yet despite these diversions, vaccine skepticism remained central to his message.

At the City Club of Cleveland, Kennedy questioned the safety of vaccines that, until 2025, were universally recommended for hepatitis B prevention. He urged parents to have “that choice” regarding newborn vaccinations, a statement met with cheers from half the audience and groans from the other. When asked about parents’ growing anxiety over measles outbreaks and infectious diseases, Kennedy acknowledged the need for vaccination—while emphasizing chronic disease prevention. “Everybody should be vaccinated—against measles,” he said. “But we need to pay more and more attention to chronic disease. All of the vaccine-preventable, infectious diseases put together kill probably 10,000 Americans a year.”

Scientific researchers estimate the actual death toll from these diseases is closer to 50,000 annually.

During a brief interview in an Ohio farmhouse, Kennedy highlighted his first-year achievements as HHS Secretary, including redesigning federal nutrition guidelines and defining ultraprocessed foods for the public. Yet his vaccine comments overshadowed these policy wins, underscoring the persistent divide over public health priorities.