NFL free-agent wide receiver Stefon Diggs is currently facing trial on a felony strangulation charge and a misdemeanor assault charge. On Wednesday, Diggs made the decision not to take the witness stand to directly rebut the allegations presented by the alleged victim, Mila Adams.
Under the American justice system, criminal defendants are constitutionally protected from being compelled to testify. The burden of proof rests entirely on the prosecution, which must establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt using other available evidence.
The alleged victim, Mila Adams, provided testimony describing an objectively compelling account of the incident. However, the remaining evidence introduced during the trial has raised significant doubts about her claims.
The prosecution’s case faced notable challenges:
- No physical evidence of injury was presented, including the absence of photographs taken at the time of the alleged incident or visible injuries when Adams reported the matter to law enforcement.
- Witnesses testified that Adams’ behavior following the alleged assault was inconsistent with typical reactions to such an event.
During closing arguments, Diggs’s legal team emphasized the lack of credibility in Adams’ assertions regarding the alleged assault. As of the latest update, the judge has completed instructing the jury on the applicable legal standards, and the panel has begun deliberations to reach a verdict.