Did Affluent Buyers End the Era of Affordable Small Cars?

An economist has made a bold claim in The New York Times: wealthy buyers, not just automakers, played a significant role in the demise of the inexpensive small car.

Conventional wisdom suggests automakers, particularly the Detroit Three (General Motors, Ford, and Stellantis), have favored SUVs and pickup trucks because these vehicles are cheaper to produce and highly profitable. Body-on-frame platforms, commonly used in trucks and SUVs, further reduce manufacturing costs while appealing to American consumers. However, Clifford Winston, the author of the op-ed, argues that this explanation is incomplete.

Winston acknowledges the industry’s preference for larger, more profitable vehicles but points to additional factors. He highlights the impact of protectionist policies from both Democratic and Republican administrations, which he believes have stifled competition and innovation in the small-car segment. Additionally, he suggests automakers have shifted their focus toward catering to buyers who can afford luxury vehicles, including high-end trucks and SUVs.

To revive the market for affordable cars, Winston proposes two key solutions:

• Eliminate existing tariffs that protect domestic automakers.
• Open the U.S. market to Chinese automakers, though with safeguards to prevent unfair competition practices such as dumping or state-subsidized undercutting.

Winston’s argument challenges the notion that the decline of small cars is solely a result of production costs and consumer demand. Instead, he suggests a more complex interplay of policy and market dynamics.

What do you think? Is Winston’s analysis accurate, or is the decline of small cars simply a matter of cost efficiency and consumer preferences? Share your thoughts in the comments.

Stay ahead in the automotive world. Subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest news, features, and insights from TTAC first.