An AI-powered tool designed to detect trademark violations on social media was allegedly used to silence critics of SXSW, the annual tech, music, and film conference held in Austin, Texas. The event, which expanded to multiple venues in March 2024 due to convention center renovations, has faced growing criticism for becoming more corporate and less accessible since its inception in 1987.

Among the groups targeted by automated takedown notices was Vocal Texas, a nonprofit advocating for issues including homelessness, HIV, poverty, and drug policy reform. On March 12, 2024, the group staged a mock encampment in downtown Austin to highlight the loss of possessions during police "sweeps"—when authorities clear out and destroy tents and supplies belonging to unhoused individuals.

An Instagram post by Vocal Texas stated,

"SXSW means unhoused Austinites in downtown face encampment sweeps, tickets and arrests while the City makes room for billionaires and corporations to rake in profits."
The post also promoted an art installation titled "Sweep the Billionaires" and did not include SXSW’s logos. Despite this, the mere mention of SXSW triggered BrandShield’s AI-driven trademark detection system, resulting in the post’s automated removal from Instagram.

Cara Gagliano, a senior staff attorney specializing in trademark and intellectual property law at the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), argued that such posts do not violate trademark laws.

"You’re allowed to use a company’s name to talk about the company, right? How else are you going to do it?"
She emphasized that trademark law includes exceptions for critical speech, noting that posts like Vocal Texas’s are clearly protected.

Gagliano also highlighted a previous case in March 2024, where the Austin for Palestine coalition received a cease-and-desist letter from SXSW for using the conference’s trademarked arrow logo in protest imagery. The EFF intervened, and the coalition never heard from SXSW again. However, Gagliano distinguished this from automated takedowns, stating that while cease-and-desist letters can be resolved, automated removals pose a greater threat to free expression by silencing critics without recourse.

Source: 404 Media