Steven Roth, CEO of Vornado Realty Trust, recently sparked controversy by equating the phrase “tax the rich” with hate speech during an earnings call on Tuesday. According to The New York Times, Roth argued that when politicians use the phrase with anger and contempt, it is as offensive as racial slurs or the phrase “from the river to the sea.”

Roth’s remarks came after New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani celebrated Governor Kathy Hochul’s proposal to tax expensive second homes in the state. Mamdani filmed the video in front of a Vornado-developed building that includes a penthouse owned by billionaire hedge-fund manager Kenneth Griffin. Griffin purchased the penthouse in 2019 for $238 million, making it the most expensive single residence ever sold in New York at the time.

While some criticized Mamdani for singling out Griffin, the billionaire himself suggested the mayor had overlooked a nearby tragedy. Griffin pointed out that the CEO of United Healthcare, Brian Thompson, was assassinated just blocks from his home. However, the broader issue remains the extreme concentration of wealth and political influence in the United States.

In March, The New York Times reported that 300 billionaires and their families contributed a staggering 19% of all federal campaign donations in 2024, totaling over $3 billion. This financial power helped elect figures like Donald Trump and Montana Senator Tim Sheehy, who received $47 million from billionaires in his race against Democrat Jon Tester. Such influence undermines democratic principles by allowing a small group to dominate political outcomes.

Roth’s reaction reflects a broader sense of entitlement among the ultra-wealthy. His claim that “tax the rich” is hate speech ignores the public’s frustration with unchecked economic inequality. The issue is not personal animosity toward individuals but the systemic imbalance of wealth and power that threatens democratic governance.

As David Koch once wrote,

“I have the right to spend whatever I choose to promote what I believe.”
However, when that spending translates into disproportionate political control, it raises serious questions about the health of American democracy. Democrats must address this structural inequality rather than fixate on divisive rhetoric.