When Tim Cook took over as Apple’s CEO in 2011, industry analysts fixated on whether he could sustain the company’s legacy of groundbreaking products. Under Steve Jobs’ return, Apple had introduced revolutionary devices like the iMac, iPod, iPhone, and iPad. Critics argued that Cook’s leadership lacked the same transformative vision, but history proved them wrong.

In 2013, two years into Cook’s tenure, analysis revealed that even Jobs’ era was defined by incremental progress as much as breakthroughs. Cook, a logistics expert rather than a product visionary, steered Apple through a period of steady refinement. His leadership made Apple one of the most successful companies of its time. Now, with Cook set to transition to executive chairman in September 2025 and John Ternus taking over as CEO, the focus shifts to Apple’s next chapter.

Unlike the dramatic handover from Jobs to Cook, Ternus’ appointment carries less fanfare. There’s no urgent need for grand declarations about his vision. Instead, the real test for Ternus lies in an area where Apple has struggled: software.

John Ternus joined Apple in 2001, initially working on displays. Over the years, his role expanded, and in 2024, he discussed the iPad Pro’s development. Despite his growing influence, he remains relatively unknown outside Apple’s inner circle. His reputation is built on hardware excellence, particularly in Apple’s recent shift to custom silicon. Devices like the 2020 MacBook Air and 2025’s MacBook Neo exemplify Apple’s hardware prowess.

However, Apple’s software performance under Cook has not mirrored this success. While there have been notable achievements—such as visionOS, the operating system powering the Vision Pro—these are exceptions rather than the rule. A closer look reveals a timeline dominated by software missteps, some still unresolved.

One of the most infamous examples occurred in September 2012, when Apple replaced Google Maps on the iPhone with its own Apple Maps. The app was widely criticized for failing at its core function: providing accurate, reliable directions. The failure was so severe that it became a cautionary tale in tech industry discussions.