In U.S. v. Demeo, decided Tuesday by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell of the Middle District of Florida, the court ruled that the defendant’s alleged online threats—posted across 22 YouTube videos—can proceed to a jury trial. The case follows a similar outcome in the recent "See MAGA, Shoot MAGA" matter, reinforcing the legal consequences of making interstate threats.
The defendant is charged under 18 U.S.C. § 875(c), which criminalizes the transmission of communications containing threats to injure another person via interstate or foreign commerce. The indictment includes a detailed chart outlining each of the 22 counts, specifying the threat, its date, and the corresponding YouTube comment ID. The alleged threats target multiple groups, including:
- Muslims
- Black Americans
- Immigrants
- People from India
The communications span a range of violent rhetoric, including:
- Threats to kill and eradicate Muslims globally and in the U.S.
- Calls for genocide and slaughter of Muslim men, women, and children.
- Plans to kidnap and execute Muslims by transporting them to remote locations and using firearms and woodchippers.
- Threats targeting immigrants, Black Americans, and people from India.
One example cited in the criminal complaint reads:
"Muslims listen up—you are not welcome here anymore. You either go back to your country or die here. ... We are going to kill every one of you who doesn’t leave—men, women, children. Zero fucks given. You’re not human. Your parasites. You inbreed biological waste. ... We can’t wait to exterminate you from our land. Last warning."
The defendant has argued that the indictment fails to state an offense and lacks specificity, but the court has rejected these claims, allowing the case to move forward.