The FBI launched a dramatic and allegedly unnecessary raid on the home of former Capitol Police officer Shauni Kerkhoff in November 2025, according to a lawsuit filed by Kerkhoff. The raid was reportedly triggered by a now-retracted article from the conservative website The Blaze, which accused Kerkhoff of being the January 6th pipe bomber based on a disputed 'gait analysis.'
The lawsuit alleges that the FBI’s response was extreme, involving bomb-sniffing dogs, agents in tactical gear, and a helicopter. The raid occurred just two days before The Blaze published its article, which has since been retracted.
Timeline of Events Leading to the Raid
According to the lawsuit, the chain of events began when Steve Baker, a reporter for The Blaze, shared his allegations with staffers for then-Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. Baker’s claims were based on a supposed similarity between Kerkhoff’s walking style and that of the bomber.
On November 6, 2025, two days before The Blaze published its article, Kerkhoff alleges that she was called into a meeting at her CIA job with two FBI agents. The agents claimed they were investigating 'online chatter' about her involvement in the attempted bombings. Kerkhoff, who had left her Capitol Police role to work in CIA security, was placed on administrative leave and asked to allow FBI agents to search her home for a pair of shoes allegedly worn by the bomber.
Kerkhoff and her boyfriend refused to grant permission for the search but agreed to meet the agents at the residence. Upon arrival, Kerkhoff alleges a 'caravan of FBI vehicles' descended on their street, including a bomb-disposal truck, an FBI helicopter, and agents in full tactical gear with drawn weapons.
Allegations of Unjustified Search and Destruction
The lawsuit claims that FBI agents 'swept through the house' with bomb-sniffing dogs, 'rifled through drawers,' and tossed belongings on the floor. At one point, Kerkhoff reportedly asked a senior agent if they were merely searching for shoes, to which she received no clear answer.
“It suddenly occurred to Ms. Kerkhoff that they were not simply looking for a pair of shoes,” the lawsuit states.
The raid, which occurred while Kerkhoff was on administrative leave from the CIA, has raised concerns about the influence of conspiracy theories on official government actions, even at the highest levels of law enforcement.
Broader Implications of the Lawsuit
Kerkhoff’s lawsuit underscores the potential dangers of conspiracy theories seeping into law enforcement investigations. The FBI’s alleged reliance on a discredited 'gait analysis' and a memo from Gabbard’s office highlights how unsubstantiated claims can lead to extreme and invasive actions.
The lawsuit also raises questions about the FBI’s handling of the situation, particularly given the lack of evidence linking Kerkhoff to the January 6th pipe bombing. The raid, which the lawsuit describes as 'wildly unnecessary,' has left Kerkhoff and her boyfriend traumatized and their home in disarray.