On November 21, 1974, the Provisional Irish Republican Army detonated bombs in two pubs in Birmingham, England, as part of its campaign to force British withdrawal from Ireland. The attack killed 21 people and injured nearly 200, making it the deadliest bombing in England since the V-2 rocket strikes of World War II.

The Wrongful Convictions and Judicial Failure

Police immediately arrested six Irishmen, securing confessions through coercion. When the men appealed their convictions, Lord Denning, a leading judge of his era, dismissed their case despite overwhelming evidence of police misconduct and their actual innocence. In his ruling, Denning stated:

If the six men win, it will mean that the police were guilty of perjury, that they were guilty of violence and threats, that the confessions were involuntary and were improperly admitted in evidence and that the convictions were erroneous.... This is such an appalling vista that every sensible person in the land would say: It cannot be right that these actions should go any further.

Denning’s decision effectively blocked further scrutiny of the case, shielding systemic failures within the British justice system. The men were not exonerated until 1991.

Colonial Policing and Its Lasting Impact

The wrongful convictions and delayed justice were not isolated incidents but reflected deeper issues in British policing. Historically, Britain’s Metropolitan Police were led by former military officials with colonial service backgrounds. This legacy shaped policing in London as a colonial outpost, characterized by corruption, favoritism toward powerful elites, and a focus on maintaining social order over justice. The closest American equivalent is the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD), notorious for its corrupt practices and colonial-style control methods.

However, the LAPD operates within a system that includes the FBI, which investigates major abuses and cases neglected by local police. In contrast, Britain’s colonial policing model lacked such oversight. If the LAPD were the sole police force nationwide—handling counterterrorism, policing New York, and Washington, D.C.—the potential for abuse would be even more extreme.

The Amnesia of Empire and Its Consequences

Britain’s historical amnesia about its imperial past has obscured the role empire played in shaping domestic institutions. Historian David Kynaston’s acclaimed tetralogy on post-war Britain (1945–1965) barely acknowledges the empire, despite its central influence on government finance, culture, and society. For decades, British schoolchildren studied the Tudors and ancient Romans in depth but learned little about the British Raj, the empire’s most lucrative colony.

The wealth extracted from the empire funded the British welfare state, a source of national pride in a country rapidly redefining its identity. However, when these imperial profits declined alongside global crises in the 1970s, Britain faced economic and social upheaval. This period culminated in Thatcherism, which dismantled the welfare state and the industrial base that had supported the working class. As Dean Acheson famously remarked in 1962, “Britain had lost an empire and had not found a role.”

By the 1990s, Britain found a new role: serving as a global hub for laundering, storing, and spending wealth plundered from the former Soviet Union. This role created lucrative opportunities for lawyers, bankers, private schools, and other elite sectors, further entrenching systemic inequalities.