The Nissan Murano has long been a reliable rental car favorite, but the 2026 model left me with unexpected opinions. After a test drive, I found myself missing the old V6 engine. While I have no inherent issue with turbocharged four-cylinder engines—they’re common and often perform well—I was struck by how the Murano’s new powertrain falls short in real-world driving.
Nissan’s variable-compression turbo design is undeniably innovative. In a market dominated by homogenized powertrains, it stands out as a rare departure from the norm. Yet, despite its technical sophistication, this engine doesn’t enhance the driving experience. The variable-compression system may offer marginal efficiency gains, but those benefits don’t translate to better performance or feel. As one reviewer noted,
"It’s unique, sure, but I can’t say it’s necessarily better for it."
The variable-compression turbo was first introduced in the 2016 Infiniti QX50, where it paired with a CVT and delivered adequate performance. A smaller version of the engine also powers the Rogue, where it performs adequately. However, the Murano is a different beast entirely. As a two-row SUV built on a wider platform and targeting buyers spending over $40,000, it competes with models like the Honda Passport and Subaru Outback—both of which have historically offered V6 options.
Honda still includes a V6 in the Passport, while Subaru has moved on to a turbocharged 2.4-liter four-cylinder in the Outback. Despite using a CVT, the Subaru’s engine feels more responsive than the Murano’s 2.0-turbo. According to Car and Driver, the Outback accelerates to 60 mph a full second quicker than the Murano. While outright speed isn’t the Murano’s priority, the engine’s lack of responsiveness is noticeable in daily driving. The outgoing V6 may not have been faster, but it felt more substantial and refined.
The new engine’s primary advantage is emissions compliance—a key consideration for automakers navigating tightening regulations. Nissan insists its target buyers aren’t demanding the V6 back, emphasizing the Murano’s focus on packaging and futuristic design over raw performance. Yet, in a segment where competitors balance efficiency with engagement, the Murano’s engine choice feels like a compromise rather than an improvement.